Can platelet activation markers predict preeclampsia and/or its severity?

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the value of platelet activation markers in predicting preeclampsia and its severity. Preeclampsia is a serious pregnancy complication that affects 3-5% of pregnancies and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality for both the mother and the fetus. METHODS: The study included 99 patients diagnosed with preeclampsia and 60 healthy pregnant women as a control group. Platelet activation markers such as mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), platelet count, and plateletcrit were evaluated along with other clinical parameters. RESULTS: The results of the study showed that platelet activation markers, particularly PDW and MPV, are valuable in the diagnosis and follow-up of preeclampsia. However, they are not sufficient to predict the severity of the disease. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that platelet activation markers could aid in predicting, diagnosing, and managing preeclampsia. However, further research is needed to determine the role of these markers in predicting the severity of the disease. The findings of this study could contribute to the development of more effective strategies for the prevention and management of preeclampsia, which could ultimately improve maternal and fetal outcomes.

OBJETIVO: El estudio tuvo como objetivo determinar el valor de los marcadores de activación plaquetaria en la predicción de la preeclampsia y su gravedad. MÉTODO: Se incluyeron 99 pacientes diagnosticadas con preeclampsia, incluyendo 36 casos graves, y un grupo control de 60 mujeres embarazadas sanas. Se evaluaron diversas variables, como el volumen plaquetario medio, el recuento de plaquetas, el hematocrito plaquetario y la amplitud de distribución plaquetaria. RESULTADOS: Los resultados mostraron que el volumen plaquetario medio y la amplitud de distribución plaquetaria son parámetros valiosos en el diagnóstico y seguimiento de la preeclampsia, aunque no son suficientes para predecir su gravedad. El análisis estadístico reveló que la edad, el volumen plaquetario medio, la amplitud de distribución plaquetaria, la semana de gestación y los puntajes de Apgar al primer y quinto minuto fueron significativamente diferentes en el grupo de preeclampsia en comparación con el grupo control. CONCLUSIONES: En conclusión, estos resultados sugieren que los marcadores de activación plaquetaria pueden ser útiles para el diagnóstico y seguimiento de la preeclampsia, y que el volumen plaquetario medio y la amplitud de distribución plaquetaria, por ser parámetros económicos y accesibles, podrían ayudar a predecir, diagnosticar y manejar esta complicación durante el embarazo.

Comparison of endometrial prostanoid profiles in three infertile subgroups: the missing part of receptivity?

OBJECTIVE: To study the prostanoid profile of the endometria of patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), unexplained infertility (UIF), and recurrent miscarriages (RM), and to compare them with the endometria of healthy fertile controls. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Fifteen patients with RIF, 18 patients with UIF, 16 patients with RM, and 23 fertile controls were recruited. INTERVENTION(S): Endometrial samples were taken during the window of implantation. After tissue homogenization and extraction, analysis with ultra-performance liquid chromatography diode array detector electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Concentrations of prostaglandin (PG) D1, PGE1, PGF1α, 6-ketoPGF1α, PGD2, PGE2, PGF2α, 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-PGJ2, PGD3, PGE3, PGF3α, thromboxane B2, 13,14-dihydro-PGE1, 13,14-dihydro-PGF1α, 13,14-dihydro-PGF2α, 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE1, 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2, and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2α were assessed. RESULT(S): Comparison of the endometria of patients with UIF and the controls showed no statistically significant differences. When the endometria of patients with RIF were compared with the controls, thromboxane B2 (TXB2) was found significantly higher (843.1 pg/mg vs. 133.5 pg/mg). When the endometria of patients with RM were compared with controls, 13,14-dihydro-15-keto PGF2α and TXB2 were found significantly higher (3907.30 pg/mg vs. 17.80 pg/mg and 858.7 pg/mg vs. 133.5 pg/mg respectively). CONCLUSION(S): We identified increased endometrial presence of TXB2 in patients with RM and RIF, and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto PGF2α in patients with RM. Although common ground is observed for RM and RIF, prostanoids, on the other hand, might make their own contribution to endometrial receptivity as important as genes and proteins. Attempts to normalize the prostaglandin profile of the endometrium via enzymatic activity can open new therapeutic options.